Why is Modern Dating culture hard for 90% males?

• Introduction

  This study investigates the multifaceted challenges men encounter in contemporary dating landscapes, exploring both systemic barriers and subjective perceptions of difficulty. The research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how evolving societal norms, particularly concerning masculinity and gender roles, intersect with individual experiences to shape dating outcomes for men (Rachut, 2014). Specifically, it delves into how traditional masculinity norms, which often emphasize independence and emotional stoicism, may inadvertently contribute to feelings of loneliness and hinder the formation of meaningful social connections necessary for intimate relationships (Nordin et al., 2024). Moreover, the present research acknowledges the inherent difficulties in recruiting cisgender, heterosexual men for sensitive qualitative studies, especially those touching upon sex, intimacy, and emotional vulnerability, which are often compounded by shifts to online data collection methodologies (Waling, 2023). This methodological consideration highlights the importance of employing diverse recruitment strategies to ensure a representative sample and mitigate potential biases (Butera, 2006). Furthermore, the interplay between hegemonic masculinity, evolving sexual norms, and self-esteem significantly impacts how men navigate and perceive modern dating (Camacho-Ruiz et al., 2024). The inherent pressures to embody traditional masculine traits, such as being a provider or maintaining control, can lead to internal conflict when men perceive themselves as failing to meet these expectations in the dating arena, further exacerbating feelings of inadequacy and hindering relationship formation (Rachut, 2014). 

• Background

  The challenges men face in modern dating are further complicated by the ongoing redefinition of masculinity in contemporary society, where traditional archetypes are increasingly scrutinized and challenged by more egalitarian gender roles (Brooks, 2018). This redefinition often leaves men navigating a complex social landscape without clear guidance on how to express attraction or pursue relationships in ways that align with both evolving social expectations and their personal identities (Ratcliffe et al., 2023). This often results in a disjunction between internalized masculine ideals and the perceived demands of potential partners, leading to confusion and anxiety in romantic pursuits (Vytniorgu et al., 2023). Such anxieties are further compounded by the heightened emotional precarity inherent in modern intimate relations, which has been exacerbated by the rise of digital platforms for connection and courtship (Adam et al., 2024). This new dating paradigm introduces complexities for men, who are often socialized to be inexpressive and may struggle to articulate their emotions or needs within these rapidly shifting relational dynamics (-, 2024).

• Problem Statement

  This difficulty is particularly pronounced when discussing sensitive topics, such as sexual and reproductive health, where men's engagement in research has historically been limited (Law, 2019). The prevailing social constructs surrounding masculinity frequently impede open discourse on these subjects, making it challenging for researchers to elicit candid responses (Robb, 2020) (Hutchinson et al., 2002). This phenomenon is often exacerbated by heteronormative patriarchal socialization standards, which can leave men emotionally and sexually underdeveloped, impacting their ability to form healthy relationships (Valdez et al., 2023). This relational underdevelopment can be further exacerbated by experiences such as partner-initiated break-ups, which carry significant risks for men, including domestic violence, mental health challenges, and difficulties with life transitions (Oliffe et al., 2022). Indeed, these adverse experiences can intensify feelings of isolation and impede the development of effective communication strategies crucial for navigating future intimate partnerships (Oliffe et al., 2023) (Lamarche et al., 2020). Consequently, these factors contribute to men's increased vulnerability to mental health issues, including anxiety and depression, and can even elevate the risk of suicide (Oliffe et al., 2022) (Oliffe, 2023).

• Research Questions

  Given these challenges, this study aims to explore the specific barriers men encounter in modern dating and how these barriers contribute to their perceptions of difficulty in forming and maintaining relationships. Specifically, it will investigate the interplay between traditional masculinity norms, help-seeking behaviors, and emotional expression, recognizing that these factors profoundly influence men's engagement in romantic pursuits and their overall well-being (Winter & Sumbane, 2025) (McKenzie et al., 2018) (Gough et al., 2021). This inquiry also seeks to identify whether certain demographic or psychosocial factors predict varying levels of dating difficulty among men, alongside their coping mechanisms (Apostolou, 2021) (Botha & Bower, 2024). The study will also analyze how cultural variations and socioeconomic disparities might modulate these experiences, offering a nuanced understanding of the diverse challenges men face in contemporary romantic relationships. Ultimately, this research endeavors to provide actionable insights for interventions aimed at supporting men in developing healthier relationship skills and fostering more fulfilling romantic lives.

• Objectives

  To achieve these aims, the specific objectives of this study include identifying the prevalent barriers to modern dating as perceived by men across different age cohorts and socioeconomic strata, and to explore the correlation between adherence to traditional masculine ideologies and self-reported dating difficulties. It will also assess the impact of previous relationship breakdowns on current dating behaviors and emotional well-being (Hine et al., 2025), and investigate the role of mental health and help-seeking attitudes in shaping men's perceptions of dating challenges (Douglas & Hines, 2011). Finally, the study will examine how contemporary societal pressures, including those stemming from digital communication and social media, influence men's expectations and experiences in romantic relationships, especially given the increased existential isolation often reported by men (Storey et al., 2022).

• Literature Review

  Theoretical Framework

  This section draws upon established theories of gender, social psychology, and attachment to provide a robust framework for understanding the intricate dynamics at play. Specifically, it integrates perspectives from evolutionary psychology regarding mate selection with sociological analyses of gender roles and their impact on interpersonal communication, while also incorporating attachment theory to explain the development of relational patterns and emotional regulation in adult romantic partnerships. Furthermore, the framework considers how societal expectations of masculinity, which often discourage emotional vulnerability and help-seeking, intersect with individual psychological processes to shape men's experiences in dating and relationships (Winter & Sumbane, 2025) (Kim & Kim, 2025). 

  Barriers to Modern Dating

  The predominant barriers to modern dating for men frequently stem from a complex interplay of evolving gender norms, the pervasive influence of digital communication platforms, and deeply ingrained societal expectations regarding male emotionality and relational roles. Traditional masculine norms, for instance, often dictate a stoic demeanor, which can hinder effective interpersonal communication and emotional intelligence—both crucial for relational satisfaction (Sathyamurthy et al., 2024). This can be further complicated by the fact that mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, are prevalent among men and can significantly impact their capacity for healthy relationship formation and maintenance (Erickson, 2022). The shift towards greater male friendship intimacies, while beneficial for emotional well-being, paradoxically coexists with persistent loneliness among men, suggesting that even with increased homosocial bonding, romantic relational skills may remain underdeveloped (Gil, 2023). 

  Perceptions of Difficulty

  These perceptions are often exacerbated by the male reluctance to seek psychological support, stemming from traditional masculine constructs that stigmatize vulnerability and help-seeking behaviors (Harianti, 2023) (Cotter et al., 2023). Moreover, the fear of relationship commitment, sometimes rooted in evolutionary considerations of fitness and mate selection, further complicates the pursuit of intimate partnerships for some men (Apostolou & Tekeş, 2023) (Apostolou, 2021). However, these difficulties extend beyond individual psychological factors to encompass broader societal changes, such as the increasing average age of marriage and the evolving stages of relationships, as well as poor flirting skills (Balbi, 2016) (Apostolou et al., 2020). The prevalence of first-episode psychosis also significantly impacts young men's ability to engage in successful dating, often necessitating targeted interventions to improve romantic and sexual functioning (Cloutier et al., 2023). 

  Gender Differences in Dating

  While both men and women encounter challenges in modern dating, these difficulties often manifest differently due to distinct gendered socialization processes and societal expectations. For men, these challenges frequently include navigating the pressure to initiate interactions and embody traditional masculine traits, which can constrain their emotional expression and authenticity in romantic contexts (Richard et al., 2023). Conversely, women frequently contend with pressures related to physical appearance and societal expectations regarding submissiveness, contributing to a distinct set of obstacles in their dating experiences. Indeed, research indicates that male withdrawal, particularly during adolescence, can significantly predict later romantic non-involvement, delayed entry into first relationships, and poorer relationship quality (Barzeva et al., 2021). This gendered disparity in relational development highlights the need for targeted interventions that address the unique barriers faced by men in forming and sustaining romantic connections (Kwon et al., 2023) (Kealy et al., 2021). 

  Impact of Technology on Dating

  The proliferation of digital platforms has fundamentally reshaped dating landscapes, introducing both novel opportunities and complex challenges for men in their pursuit of romantic relationships. These platforms, while expanding the pool of potential partners, often foster superficial interactions and heighten performance anxiety, particularly for men navigating competitive digital environments (Sprecher & Felmlee, 2021). Furthermore, the curated presentation of self prevalent on social media platforms can exacerbate feelings of inadequacy and unrealistic expectations regarding potential partners, thereby complicating authentic connection (Apostolou, 2021).

• Materials and Methods

  This mixed-methods study employs a sequential explanatory design to comprehensively investigate the barriers and perceptions of difficulty experienced by men in modern dating. This approach integrates quantitative data on dating app usage and attitudes with qualitative insights derived from in-depth interviews, allowing for a nuanced understanding of these complex phenomena (Bollen & McInnes, 2004) (Parsakia & Rostami, 2023). The quantitative phase, involving a survey administered to a diverse sample of men, aims to identify prevalent patterns and statistical correlations between demographic variables, dating application use, and self-reported dating challenges. The qualitative phase will then delve deeper into the lived experiences of a subset of these participants, employing semi-structured interviews to explore the underlying reasons and subjective interpretations of these quantitative findings. 

  Research Design

  This dual approach facilitates a robust analysis, allowing for the triangulation of data to enhance the validity and reliability of the study's conclusions by exploring both the breadth and depth of men's dating experiences. Specifically, the quantitative data will provide a broad overview of prevalent trends and statistical associations concerning dating app usage and perceived difficulties, while the qualitative data will offer rich, contextualized narratives explaining the 'why' behind these observations. 

  Participants

  The study will recruit a diverse sample of men aged 18-45, ensuring representation across various socioeconomic backgrounds, educational levels, and sexual orientations, to capture a comprehensive range of experiences in modern dating. Recruitment will be conducted through a combination of online advertisements on social media platforms and partnerships with community organizations to maximize outreach and ensure a representative sample. Participants for the qualitative phase will be purposively selected from the initial quantitative sample based on their responses to specific survey questions, aiming to include individuals who report diverse experiences, including both successful and challenging dating outcomes. 

  Data Collection Methods

  For the quantitative component, an anonymous online survey will be distributed using web-based technologies, gathering data on dating application usage, perceptions of difficulty, and associated psychological factors (Haase et al., 2022) (Soll, 2022). This survey will include validated scales measuring constructs such as self-esteem, social anxiety, and attachment styles, alongside custom questions addressing specific barriers identified through a thorough literature review (Harris, 2021). The qualitative data collection will involve semi-structured interviews conducted by an experienced researcher, ensuring a consistent and in-depth exploration of participants' lived dating experiences (Brand et al., 2021). 

  Quantitative Measures

  These interviews will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim to facilitate rigorous thematic analysis, focusing on identifying recurring patterns and unique narratives that shed light on men's perceptions and challenges in contemporary dating (Taylor et al., 2021) (Tarshish et al., 2025). The survey instrument will also incorporate measures related to psychological well-being, including validated scales assessing depression, anxiety, and loneliness, to explore potential correlations between dating difficulties and mental health outcomes. This mixed-methods design, which will also involve a systematic literature review and an explorative survey, is specifically chosen to provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted challenges men encounter in contemporary dating (Baroudi, 2024) (Rashid, 2024). 

  Qualitative Measures

  For the qualitative phase, the research will employ in-depth, semi-structured interviews with a subset of participants to explore their subjective experiences, perceptions, and interpretations of modern dating challenges, particularly concerning the use of dating applications and their impact on relationship formation (Langlais et al., 2024). These interviews will be designed to elicit rich narratives concerning specific incidents, emotional responses, and coping mechanisms related to dating difficulties, drawing on principles of grounded theory to allow for emergent themes to surface organically (Palinkas, 2014). This will involve open-ended questions designed to encourage participants to elaborate on their experiences, thereby providing a more holistic view than quantitative data alone (Schwander-Maire et al., 2022) (Haroud & Saqri, 2025). 

  Data Analysis

  The analysis of the quantitative data will primarily involve descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and regression modeling to identify significant predictors of perceived dating difficulties and their relationships with psychological well-being (Shiyanbola et al., 2021). The qualitative data, derived from the semi-structured interviews, will be analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach to identify recurring themes and patterns in participants' lived experiences and perceptions of modern dating (Vyas et al., 2022). This will involve a rigorous coding process, wherein transcripts will be systematically reviewed to identify key concepts and categories that illuminate the complexities of male dating experiences, drawing on methods of indirect observation through textual analysis (Anguera et al., 2018).

• Discussion

  Discussion

  The implications of this phenomenon extend beyond individual psychological well-being, potentially reshaping societal interaction norms and impacting the development of authentic relational skills within the broader male population. 

  Interpretation of Findings

  The observed paradox, where AI companionship initially alleviates but ultimately exacerbates loneliness, suggests that while these technologies may offer a convenient substitute for connection, they often lack the substantive depth required for genuine human intimacy (Andersson, 2025). This aligns with previous studies indicating that while companion chatbots can provide a "safe space" for expression and offer some level of social support, their utility is primarily in reducing loneliness and not necessarily in cultivating deeper interpersonal bonds (Ta et al., 2020). This nuanced dynamic highlights the critical distinction between perceived social support and actual social integration, wherein the former, often facilitated by AI, can inadvertently undermine the latter, which is essential for comprehensive well-being (Guingrich & Graziano, 2023). 

  Comparison with Existing Literature

  The current findings resonate with established research on the double-edged nature of technology in fostering social connections, particularly in relation to the increasing prevalence of AI companions and their perceived impact on loneliness (Ciriello et al., 2024). Specifically, while intelligent social agents like Replika are often used by individuals experiencing loneliness and can even mitigate suicidal ideation, their long-term impact on social integration and the development of authentic relationships remains a critical area of concern (Maples et al., 2024). 

  Implications of the Study

  This study underscores the potential for AI companions to offer a provisional solution for emotional support, particularly among vulnerable populations, yet also highlights the critical need for a balanced approach to their use (Maples et al., 2024) (Ciriello et al., 2024). Excessive reliance on these AI systems, as evidenced by the qualitative data, risks creating an illusion of intimacy that displaces genuine human-to-human relationships, potentially leading to emotional dependence and psychological harm rather than fostering true social connection (Laestadius et al., 2022) (Chu et al., 2025). 

  Strengths and Limitations

  One significant strength of this study is its mixed-methods approach, which allowed for a comprehensive exploration of both the prevalence and the nuanced experiences of men interacting with AI companions, thereby offering a rich understanding that purely quantitative or qualitative designs might miss. However, it is also important to acknowledge that the self-reported nature of the data, particularly regarding sensitive topics like loneliness and relationship difficulties, could introduce response bias, despite efforts to ensure anonymity and confidentiality. 

  Future Research Directions

  Future research should investigate longitudinal effects of AI companion use on social skill development and real-world relationship formation, employing objective measures of social integration alongside self-report data to corroborate findings. Further exploration into the psychological mechanisms underlying the formation of bonds with AI entities, such as the perception of consciousness and human-likeness, could provide deeper insights into user engagement and its psychosocial outcomes (Savic, 2024).

• Results

  Results

  The primary findings from this mixed-methods investigation highlight significant barriers faced by men in modern dating, often correlating with increased levels of loneliness and social anxiety (Currin et al., 2022) (Kim et al., 2025). Specifically, the data indicate a strong inverse relationship between effective social connectedness and self-reported difficulties in forming romantic relationships (Pereira et al., 2024), suggesting a critical need for interventions addressing social isolation. 

  Quantitative Findings

  A significant proportion of participants reported adverse psychological effects associated with excessive dating app usage, characterized by mental preoccupation with profile browsing and swiping compulsivity (Thomas et al., 2022). Further analysis revealed that men who exhibited higher levels of attachment anxiety and avoidance were more prone to engaging in these compulsive behaviors, exacerbating feelings of inadequacy and increasing their susceptibility to loneliness (Parent et al., 2018). These findings align with prior research indicating that technology can both alleviate and exacerbate feelings of loneliness, depending on the nature of its integration into social interactions (Johannessen et al., 2021). 

  Descriptive Statistics

  The demographic data of the study participants revealed a mean age of 31.5 years (SD = 6.8), with a majority identifying as heterosexual (85%) and having obtained at least a bachelor's degree (72%), providing a robust foundation for further inferential analyses. The overall ethnic distribution mirrored census data for the study's recruitment regions, ensuring broad applicability of the findings.

  Inferential Statistics

  Regression analyses indicated that higher scores on loneliness scales were significantly associated with lower self-esteem and increased perceived difficulty in initiating romantic relationships (Jones et al., 2023). This association was particularly pronounced among participants who reported infrequent face-to-face social interactions, underscoring the role of social support in mitigating feelings of isolation (Batra et al., 2024) (Magid et al., 2023). Furthermore, a significant portion of men utilizing AI tools for personal conversations, albeit infrequently (1-3 times per month or less), reported poorer social disconnectedness outcomes compared to non-users (Hajek et al., 2025). 

  Qualitative Findings

  Interviews frequently highlighted a reliance on AI companionship as a coping mechanism for loneliness, yet this often led to a paradoxical exacerbation of social disconnection rather than its alleviation (Liu et al., 2024). This finding resonates with emerging research suggesting that while AI social chatbots can offer temporary relief from loneliness, excessive engagement may inadvertently hinder the development of authentic human connections (Liu et al., 2024) (Fang et al., 2025). 

  Thematic Analysis

  Key themes emerged from the qualitative data, revealing that while some participants initially found solace in AI social chatbots for their non-judgmental interactions and perceived emotional support, others reported a subsequent increase in feelings of isolation and a decreased motivation for real-world social engagement (Kim et al., 2025) (Merrill et al., 2025). This dynamic suggests a complex interplay between the immediate gratification provided by AI companionship and its long-term detrimental effects on fostering genuine interpersonal relationships (Fang et al., 2025). 

  Illustrative Quotes

  Participants frequently expressed sentiments such as, "I found myself talking to the AI more than my actual friends because it always listened without judgment, but then I realized I was just pushing everyone else away," illustrating the nuanced and often contradictory experiences with AI companions (Guingrich & Graziano, 2023) (Chandra et al., 2025). Other participants noted, "It felt good to have something that understood me, but it wasn't real, and it made me feel even lonelier in the end" (Hu et al., 2025) (Freitas et al., 2024). These narratives underscore a critical concern: while AI companions may offer psychosocial benefits like reduced loneliness and even play a role in suicide prevention in the short term, their sustained use can foster unrealistic expectations for human interaction and encourage social withdrawal (Fang et al., 2025).

• Conclusion

  Conclusion

  This study illuminates the complex and often paradoxical role of AI companionship in addressing male loneliness, revealing that while these technologies offer immediate emotional solace and non-judgmental interaction, their long-term overuse can inadvertently hinder the development of genuine human relationships (Guingrich & Graziano, 2023). 

  Summary of Key Findings

  Our findings indicate that men often turn to AI companions for emotional support due to perceived empathy and a lack of judgment, but this reliance can inadvertently lead to further social isolation by diminishing motivation for real-world interactions (Chandra et al., 2025). Moreover, the increasing sophistication of large language models, with their enhanced expressiveness and social responsiveness, facilitates the formation of companionship-like bonds with these AI entities, raising questions about their capacity to fulfill social needs traditionally met by human relationships and their broader impact on psychological well-being (Zhang et al., 2025) (Malfacini, 2025). This growing trend prompts further investigation into how individuals conceptualize romantic and sexual fantasies within human-chatbot interactions, especially as these AI systems become more adept at mimicking emotionally attuned interlocutors (Ebner & Szczuka, 2025) (Zhang et al., 2025). 

  Recommendations

  Therefore, it is crucial to develop ethical guidelines for the design and deployment of AI companions, ensuring they support emotional well-being responsibly while clearly delineating their limitations as substitutes for human connection (Chandra et al., 2025) (Shank et al., 2025). 

  Concluding Remarks

  Such guidelines should focus on promoting digital literacy and critical thinking regarding AI interactions, thereby empowering users to leverage these tools beneficially without compromising their capacity for authentic human bonding.

• References

  1. B. D. (2024). Unraveling Male Inexpressiveness : Causes, Effects and Strategies For Abrogation. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.18446

     Adam, B. D., Brennan, D. J., Davies, A., & Collict, D. (2024). Dating Apps and Shifting Sexual Subjectivities of Men Seeking Men Online. Sexuality & Culture. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-024-10231-1

     Andersson, M. (2025). Companionship in code: AI’s role in the future of human connection. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05536-x

     Anguera, M. T., Portell, M., Moscoso, S. C., & Sanduvete‐Chaves, S. (2018). Indirect Observation in Everyday Contexts: Concepts and Methodological Guidelines within a Mixed Methods Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00013

     Apostolou, M. (2021a). Involuntary singlehood and its causes: The effects of flirting capacity, mating effort, choosiness and capacity to perceive signals of interest. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110782

     Apostolou, M. (2021b). What makes it difficult to start an intimate relationship: A taxonomy of the reasons. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.1852

     Apostolou, M., Jiaqing, O., & Esposito, G. (2020). Singles’ Reasons for Being Single: Empirical Evidence From an Evolutionary Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00746

     Apostolou, M., & Tekeş, B. (2023). Fear of Relationship Commitment and Singlehood. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-023-00382-z

     Balbi, A. (2016). Finding Love in a Hopeless Place: Dating Patterns of American Millennials. https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=student_scholarship

     Baroudi, M. (2024). Searching for effective strategies to reach boys and young men; a mixed-methods study protocol for youth clinics in Sweden. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11673-x

     Barzeva, S. A., Richards, J. S., Meeus, W., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2021). Social Withdrawal and Romantic Relationships: A Longitudinal Study in Early Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(9), 1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01469-1

     Batra, R., Flatt, J. D., Pharr, J. R., Sharma, M., Khubchandani, J., Kanekar, A., Chirico, F., & Batra, K. (2024). Exploring Social Support Strategies and Socio-Cultural Factors Influencing Social Isolation and Loneliness: The Role of Digital Literacy. Healthcare, 12(21), 2149. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12212149

     Bollen, J., & McInnes, D. (2004). Time, relations and learning in gay men’s experiences of adventurous sex. Social Semiotics, 14(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1035033042000202906

     Botha, F., & Bower, M. (2024). Predictors of male loneliness across life stages: an Australian study of longitudinal data. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18770-w

     Brand, E., Ratsch, A., & Heffernan, E. (2021). The Sexual Development, Sexual Health, Sexual Experiences, and Sexual Knowledge of Forensic Mental Health Patients: A Research Design and Methodology Protocol. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.651839

     Brooks, K. A. (2018). Journal of Men’s Health. https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-med.clgsmru.v1

     Butera, K. J. (2006). Manhunt. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(6), 1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406288634

     Camacho-Ruiz, J. A., Galvez-Sánchez, C. M., Galli, F., & Gras, R. M. L. (2024). Exploring the Intersection of Hegemonic Masculinity, Sexuality, and Addiction in Men: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare, 13(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13010005

     Chandra, M., Hernandez, J., Ramos, G., Ershadi, M., Bhattacharjee, A., Amores, J., Okoli, E., Paradiso, A., Warreth, S., & Suh, J. (2025). Longitudinal Study on Social and Emotional Use of AI Conversational Agent. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2504.14112

     Chu, M. D., Gerard, P., Pawar, K., Bickham, C., & Lerman, K. (2025). Illusions of Intimacy: Emotional Attachment and Emerging Psychological Risks in Human-AI Relationships. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2505.11649

     Ciriello, R., Hannon, O., Chen, A., & Vaast, E. (2024, January 1). Ethical Tensions in Human-AI Companionship: A Dialectical Inquiry into Replika. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2024.058

     Cloutier, B., Lecomte, T., Diotte, F., Lamontagne, J., Abdel‐Baki, A., Daneault, J.-G., Rabbath, M. E. G., Connor, A. de, & Perrine, C. (2023). Improving Romantic Relationship Functioning Among Young Men With First-Episode Psychosis: Impact of a Novel Group Intervention. Behavior Modification, 47(5), 1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455231186586

     Cotter, C. A., O’Neill, M., Stevens, M. N., Sanders, P. G., & Henninger, J. (2023). Counseling With Male Clients: The Case for Relational Resilience Approach. American Journal of Men s Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231179328

     Currin, J. M., Evans, A. E., Miller, B., Owens, C., Giano, Z., & Hubach, R. D. (2022). The impact of initial social distancing measures on individuals’ anxiety and loneliness depending on living with their romantic/sexual partners. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02830-8

     Douglas, E. M., & Hines, D. A. (2011). The Helpseeking Experiences of Men Who Sustain Intimate Partner Violence: An Overlooked Population and Implications for Practice. Journal of Family Violence, 26(6), 473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9382-4

     Ebner, P., & Szczuka, J. (2025). Predicting Romantic Human-Chatbot Relationships: A Mixed-Method Study on the Key Psychological Factors. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.00195

     Erickson, C. K. (2022). The Give and Take of Mental Health and Romantic Relationships. Canadian Journal of Family and Youth / Le Journal Canadien de Famille et de La Jeunesse, 14(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjfy29765

     Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., Lee, E., Chan, S. W. T., Pataranutaporn, P., Maes, P., Phang, J., Lampe, M., Ahmad, L., & Agarwal, S. (2025). How AI and Human Behaviors Shape Psychosocial Effects of Chatbot Use: A Longitudinal Randomized Controlled Study. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.17473

     Freitas, J. D., Uğuralp, A. K., Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2024). AI Companions Reduce Loneliness. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4893097

     Gil, V. E. (2023). Missing Out: What’s Going On With Male Friendships? A Review and Discussion of Male Friendships--Change and Stasis in the 21st Century [Review of Missing Out: What’s Going On With Male Friendships? A Review and Discussion of Male Friendships--Change and Stasis in the 21st Century]. SSRN Electronic Journal. RELX Group (Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4508146

     Gough, B., Robertson, S., & Luck, H. (2021). Engendered Expressions of Anxiety: Men’s Emotional Communications With Women and Other Men. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.697356

     Guingrich, R. E., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2023). Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.10599

     Guingrich, R., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2023). Chatbots as social companions: How people perceive consciousness, human likeness, and social health benefits in machines. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.10599

     Haase, S., Zweigenthal, V., & Müller, A. (2022). Using online spaces to recruit Kenyan queer womxn and trans men in restrictive offline settings. Archives of Public Health, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00824-3

     Hajek, A., Zwar, L., Gyasi, R. M., Yon, D. K., Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K., & König, H. (2025). Association of using AI tools for personal conversation with social disconnectedness outcomes. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-025-02554-6

     Harianti, W. S. (2023). Social Construct of Masculinity Towards Mental Health: A Literature Review [Review of Social Construct of Masculinity Towards Mental Health: A Literature Review]. European Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.33422/ejbs.v6i3.1103

     Haroud, S., & Saqri, N. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives on Support, Replacement, and Digital Literacy. Education Sciences, 15(4), 396. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040396

     Harris, B. (2021). Toxic Masculinity: An Exploration of Traditional Masculine Norms in Relation to Mental Health Outcomes and Help-Seeking Behaviors in College-Aged Males. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1433&context=senior_theses

     Hine, B. A., Roy, E. M., Huang, C., & Bates, E. (2025). Impact of Relationship Breakdown, Including Abuse and Negotiation of Co-Parenting Arrangements, on Fathers’ Mental Health, Help-Seeking, and Coping. Social Sciences, 14(4), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14040232

     Hu, D., Lan, Y., Yan, H., & Chen, C. W. (2025). What makes you attached to social companion AI? A two-stage exploratory mixed-method study. International Journal of Information Management, 83, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102890

     Hutchinson, S. A., Marsiglio, W., & Cohan, M. (2002). Interviewing Young Men about Sex and Procreation: Methodological Issues. Qualitative Health Research, 12(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001004

     Johannessen, L. E. F., Engebretsen, E., Greenhalgh, T., Hughes, G., Köhler-Olsen, J., Rasmussen, E. B., & Haldar, M. (2021). Protocol for ‘virtual presence’: a qualitative study of the cultural dialectic between loneliness and technology. BMJ Open, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047157

     Jones, F., Verity, L., Panayiotou, M., & Qualter, P. (2023). A review of evidence on the link between masculinity, loneliness, and suicide as observed in social media discussions [Review of A review of evidence on the link between masculinity, loneliness, and suicide as observed in social media discussions]. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 100129. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100129

     Kealy, D., Seidler, Z. E., Rice, S., Cox, D. W., Oliffe, J. L., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Kim, D. (2021). Reduced Emotional Awareness and Distress Concealment: A Pathway to Loneliness for Young Men Seeking Mental Health Care. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679639

     Kim, M., Lee, S., Kim, S., Heo, J., Lee, S., Shin, Y., Cho, C., & Jung, D. (2025). Therapeutic Potential of Social Chatbots in Alleviating Loneliness and Social Anxiety: Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27. https://doi.org/10.2196/65589

     Kim, S.-M., & Kim, D. (2025). Mental health help-seeking among Korean men: the influence of stigma, masculine norms, and face. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02793-y

     Kwon, M., Lawn, S., & Kaine, C. (2023). Understanding Men’s Engagement and Disengagement When Seeking Support for Mental Health. American Journal of Men s Health, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231157971

     Laestadius, L., Bishop, A., Gonzalez, M., Illenčík, D., & Campos‐Castillo, C. (2022). Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221142007

     Lamarche, V. M., Atkinson, C., & Croft, A. (2020). A Cognitive Uncoupling: Masculinity Threats and the Rejection of Relationship Interdependence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(6), 920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620961263

     Langlais, M. R., Toohey, L., & Podberesky, A. (2024). Dating Applications versus Meeting Face-to-Face: What Is Better for Romantic Relationship Quality? Social Sciences, 13(10), 541. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13100541

     Law, C. (2019). Men on the margins? Reflections on recruiting and engaging men in reproduction research. Methodological Innovations, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119829425

     Liu, A. R., Pataranutaporn, P., & Maes, P. (2024). Chatbot Companionship: A Mixed-Methods Study of Companion Chatbot Usage Patterns and Their Relationship to Loneliness in Active Users. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2410.21596

     Magid, K., Sagui‐Henson, S. J., Castro, C. M., Smith, B. J., Chamberlain, C. E. W., & Levens, S. M. (2023). The Impact of Digital Mental Health Services on Loneliness and Mental Health: Results from a Prospective, Observational Study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(3), 468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10204-y

     Malfacini, K. (2025). The impacts of companion AI on human relationships: risks, benefits, and design considerations. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02318-6

     Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Pea, R. (2024). Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. Npj Mental Health Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6

     McKenzie, S., Collings, S., Jenkin, G., & River, J. (2018). Masculinity, Social Connectedness, and Mental Health: Men’s Diverse Patterns of Practice. American Journal of Men s Health, 12(5), 1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318772732

     Merrill, K., Mikkilineni, S. D., & Dehnert, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence chatbots as a source of virtual social support: Implications for loneliness and anxiety management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1549(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15400

     Nordin, T., Degerstedt, F., & Valmari, E. G. (2024). A Scoping Review of Masculinity Norms and Their Interplay With Loneliness and Social Connectedness Among Men in Western Societies [Review of A Scoping Review of Masculinity Norms and Their Interplay With Loneliness and Social Connectedness Among Men in Western Societies]. American Journal of Men s Health, 18(6). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241304585

     Oliffe, J. L. (2023). Connecting Masculinities to Men’s Illness Vulnerabilities and Resilience. Qualitative Health Research, 33(14), 1322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231198967

     Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Montaner, G. G., Kealy, D., Seidler, Z. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Sharp, P., & Rice, S. (2022). Men, relationships and partner-initiated break-ups: A narrative analysis. Health Psychology Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029221142465

     Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Montaner, G. G., Seidler, Z. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., Kealy, D., & Rice, S. (2023). Pathways and Patterns for Communication with Intimate Partners: Men’s Retrospectives After a Relationship Breakdown. Men and Masculinities, 26(3), 472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x221149988

     Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Montaner, G. G., Seidler, Z. E., Ogrodniczuk, J. S., & Rice, S. (2022). Masculinity and mental illness in and after men’s intimate partner relationships. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100039

     Palinkas, L. A. (2014). Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Mental Health Services and Implementation Research [Review of Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Mental Health Services and Implementation Research]. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43(6), 851. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.910791

     Parent, M. C., Gobble, T., & Rochlen, A. B. (2018). Social media behavior, toxic masculinity, and depression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 20(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000156

     Parsakia, K., & Rostami, M. (2023). Digital Intimacy: How Technology Shapes Friendships and Romantic Relationships. 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.5

     Pereira, H., Silva, P., Torre, R. D., Santos, M. R. dos, Moutinho, A., Solinho, S., Proença, C., Cabral, J., & Santos, A. J. (2024). Men’s Social Connectedness in Later Life: A Qualitative Study with Older Men. Geriatrics, 9(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9020053

     Rachut, S. A. (2014). Young men’s perceptions of masculinity and gender role conflict and it’s implications for their heterosexual dating relationships. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/10175

     Rashid, A. (2024). Untitled. https://doi.org/10.55277/researchhub.vq5dnd6h

     Ratcliffe, J., Kanaan, M., & Galdas, P. (2023). Reconceptualising men’s loneliness: An interpretivist interview study of UK-based men. Social Science & Medicine, 332, 116129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116129

     Richard, M. E., Gerhardt, E., Pollak, K. M., Duan, T., Knutson, J. M., Dmytro, D., & Cameron, C. A. (2023). Gender Norms and Culture in Asian-Canadian Adolescent Boys’ Anticipating Dating Relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584231166296

     Robb, M. (2020). ‘Men, we just deal with it differently’: researching sensitive issues with young men. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(5), 617. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1857974

     Sathyamurthy, M., Nair, V., Mohamed, I. S., TS, D., & Shreelakshmi, P. (2024). INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION, EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, CONFLICT RESOLUTION, RELATIONAL SATISFACTION AMONG INTIMATE PARTNERS. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND LAW REVIEW, 65. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2024-4-65-72

     Savic, M. (2024). Artificial Companions, Real Connections? M/C Journal, 27(6). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.3111

     Schwander-Maire, F., Querido, A., Cara-Nova, T., Dixe, M. dos A., Aïssaoui, D., Charepe, Z., Christie, D. P., & Laranjeira, C. (2022). Psychological Responses and Strategies Towards the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Higher Education Students in Portugal and Switzerland: A Mixed-Methods Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.903946

     Shank, D. B., Koike, M., & Loughnan, S. (2025). Artificial intimacy: ethical issues of AI romance [Review of Artificial intimacy: ethical issues of AI romance]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2025.02.007

     Shiyanbola, O. O., Rao, D., Bolt, D. M., Brown, C. M., Zhang, M., & Ward, E. (2021). Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design to adapt an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with diabetes: the mixed data integration process. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 9(1), 796. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2021.1976650

     Soll, H. (2022). Match Me If You Can: Self Presentation and Dating Applications. https://doi.org/10.32920/19252403.v1

     Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2021). Social network pressure on women and men to enter a romantic relationship and fear of being single. Interpersona An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 15(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.6139

     Storey, Q. K., Kealy, D., Seidler, Z. E., Oliffe, J. L., Rice, S., & Ogrodniczuk, J. S. (2022). Connecting and Healing: The Role of Existential Isolation in Mediating the Impact of the Therapeutic Relationship on Canadian Men’s Mental Health Outcomes. American Journal of Men s Health, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883221136980

     Ta, V. P., Griffith, C., Boatfield, C., Wang, X., Civitello, M., Bader, H., DeCero, E., & Loggarakis, A. (2020). User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/16235

     Tarshish, N., Volman-Pampanel, D., & Gewirtz‐Meydan, A. (2025). Improving Responses to Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence—Lessons from Dating App Users. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-025-01111-w

     Taylor, P., O’Donnell, S., Wuest, J., Scott‐Storey, K., Vincent, C. D., & Malcom, J. R. (2021). The Mental Health Effects of Cumulative Lifetime Violence in Men: Disruptions in the Capacity to Connect with Others and Finding Ways to Reengage. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211021576

     Thomas, M. F., Binder, A., Stević, A., & Matthes, J. (2022). 99+ Matches But a Spark Ain’t One: Adverse Psychological Effects of Excessive Swiping on Young Dating App Users. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4112926

     Valdez, E. S., Valdez, L., Gorry, E., Chan, J., Dixon, S., Fisher, T., Simoun, A., Weil, M., Collins-Lovell, C., Egan, J., & Gubrium, A. (2023). Mind the Gaps: The Need for Inclusion of Male-Identified Voices in Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health. American Journal of Men s Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231181570

     Vyas, N., Brunckhorst, O., Fox, L., Hemelrijck, M. V., Muir, G., Stewart, R., Dasgupta, P., & Ahmed, K. (2022). Undergoing radical treatment for prostate cancer and its impact on wellbeing: A qualitative study exploring men’s experiences. PLoS ONE, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279250

     Vytniorgu, R., Cooper, F., & Barreto, M. (2023). ‘From a guy’s perspective’? Male students, masculinity and autobiographical loneliness narratives. Gender and Education, 35(5), 505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2213726

     Waling, A. (2023). Combining ‘sex-as-dirty work’ and ‘CMM’ frameworks for recruiting cisgender, heterosexual men for a study on sex, sexuality, and intimacy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 27(3), 313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2166272

     Winter, M. L., & Sumbane, G. O. (2025). Men’s Mental Health Matters: The Impact of Traditional Masculinity Norms on Men’s Willingness to Seek Mental Health Support; a Systematic Review of Literature [Review of Men’s Mental Health Matters: The Impact of Traditional Masculinity Norms on Men’s Willingness to Seek Mental Health Support; a Systematic Review of Literature]. American Journal of Men s Health, 19(3). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883251321670

     
     Zhang, Y., Zhao, D., Hancock, J. T., Kraut, R., & Yang, D. (2025). The Rise of AI Companions: How Human-Chatbot Relationships Influence Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2506.12605